Nadia built her MVP in Lovable over two evenings, demoed it, and a 200-seat enterprise wanted in. Then the security questionnaire arrived: sixty questions on auth, audit logging, data residency, and key rotation. She could answer four of them. The deal stalled on Question 14.
Rescue
AI code rescue for the vibe-coded app that’s about to scale.
You shipped your MVP with Lovable, Bolt, v0, Cursor, Replit, Copilot, Claude Code or ChatGPT. Now an enterprise prospect is on Question 14 of their security questionnaire, your investor wants the auth, and the chat you built half the app in has .env secrets pasted into it. One 5-day audit, a fix list ranked Critical / High / Medium with sample code per finding.
24hreply, from a senior
200+projects shipped since 2019
Senioronly, on the spine
Why founders book the audit
You shipped fast. Now find out what’s missing before someone else does.
An AI-built MVP can pass a demo and still fail a security questionnaire. We run the same audit pattern across eleven tools, then hand you a ranked fix list by day six.
“The product wasn’t the problem. The plumbing was. None of it showed in the demo, all of it showed in diligence.”
001
0+
AI-built codebases audited since 2023. One pattern, eleven tools.
002
0
Median critical and high findings per codebase. Most founders are surprised.
003
0
Audited founders who lost their investor or pilot after the fix list shipped.
The founder this page is forQuestion 14 · “where’s your auth?” · signed pilot
Nadia shipped in a weekend. The demo landed. The questionnaire did not.
The product wasn’t the problem. The plumbing was. The AI had wired Supabase with row-level security switched off, pasted the service-role key into the client bundle, and left no audit log. None of it showed in the demo. All of it showed in diligence.
We ran the 5-day audit, handed her a fix list ranked Critical / High / Medium with sample code per finding, and she closed the pilot three weeks later. This page is for founders who shipped with an AI tool and now have to prove the code is safe.
Security + compliance pack
What ships in the audit. What your CFO, CTO, and DPO see in writing.
The ranked fix list
Every finding ranked Critical / High / Medium, with the impact in plain English and sample code for the fix. Prioritised so you know what to do first.
OWASP + pen-test summary
The OWASP Top 10 pass written up, plus a pen-test summary your enterprise buyer can attach to their security review.
SOC-2-readiness notes
The gaps between where your code is now and what a SOC 2 Type II evidence pipeline needs. The shortlist, not the textbook.
GDPR + DSAR notes
Where personal data lives, what’s missing for a 30-day DSAR response, and where to add right-to-erasure at the schema for UK + EU customers.
The day. What we look at, what you get.
Same pattern across all eleven tools. The fix list lands the morning after day five.
- 01
“The AI pasted my service-role key straight into the client bundle.”
Secret-leak sweep, auth model, session handling. We scan the repo and chat history for leaked keys, check who can call what, and flag every endpoint that trusts the client.
- 02
“Row-level security was switched off and I didn’t know it had a switch.”
RLS / access rules, tenant isolation, PII paths. We map who can read whose data, test for cross-tenant leaks, and trace every place customer data is stored or logged.
- 03
“It worked at ten users. At a thousand it fell over and I didn’t know why.”
Scaling limits, N+1s, the migration path off the platform. We find the queries that won’t scale, the platform limits you’re about to hit, and the cleanest route to production infrastructure.
- 04
“I have no idea if my forms are open to injection or my files to upload abuse.”
OWASP Top 10 pass, input validation, rate limits. We test the common abuse paths the AI never wired against: injection, broken access control, unvalidated uploads, missing rate limits.
- 05
“The questionnaire wants audit logs, GDPR notes, and a pen-test summary I don’t have.”
SOC-2-readiness notes, GDPR/DSAR gaps, the ranked fix list. You get the report: findings ranked Critical / High / Medium, sample code per fix, and the compliance gaps to close before diligence.
Scale + receipts
The numbers your VC,
The numbers your VC,
CFO, and acquirer ask about, not adjectives
The same seniors who run the audit have shipped production code at scale for seven years. The receipts that survive Series B diligence.
In production
£540M+
GMV / transactions through code we shipped
320M+
API calls per year, 2025
Trust
0
Customer-data breaches in seven years
SOC 2
Type II achieved, Dec 2025
Track record
12
Series A founders raised Series B with us
96%
Engineer retention, same seniors sign + ship
What the audit covers
One pattern. Five passes.
The same five-pass sweep runs across all eleven AI tools, so nothing in a vibe-coded MVP slips past the report.
PASS
(01)
Secrets + auth
We scan the repo and chat history for leaked keys, check who can call what, and flag every endpoint that trusts the client.
Secret-leak sweep
Auth model
Session handling
Key rotation
Secrets + auth
PASS
(02)
Data + access
We map who can read whose data, test for cross-tenant leaks, and trace every place customer data is stored or logged.
Row-level security
Tenant isolation
PII paths
Audit log
Data + access
PASS
(03)
Architecture + scale
We find the queries that won’t scale, the platform limits you’re about to hit, and the cleanest route to production infrastructure.
Scaling limits
N+1 queries
Migration path
Indexing
Architecture + scale
PASS
(04)
OWASP + abuse
We test the common abuse paths the AI never wired against: injection, broken access control, unvalidated uploads, and missing rate limits.
OWASP Top 10
Input validation
Rate limits
Upload checks
OWASP + abuse
PASS
(05)
Compliance + handover
You get the report: findings ranked Critical / High / Medium, sample code per fix, and the compliance gaps to close before diligence.
SOC-2 readiness
GDPR / DSAR
Pen-test summary
Ranked fix list
Compliance + handover
Audit first. Then your call.
The 5-day audit is the front door. Where it leads is up to you. No lock-in either way.
The 5-day audit
Fixed scope, fixed fee, fix list by day six. You keep the report whatever you do next.
- £8K, all eleven tools
- Critical / High / Medium ranking
- Sample code per finding
- Slot held if your deadline slips
Fixed-scope fix
We take the fix list and ship the Critical and High items as a defined piece of work.
- Scoped from the audit findings
- From £18K, 4-6 weeks
- IP assigns on commit
- 30-day walk-away both ways
Advisory retainer
A senior engineer who knows your codebase, on call for the diligence calls and the next build.
- £5K / month
- Same seniors who ran the audit
- Diligence-call support
- Pause with 14 days’ notice
What founders actually ask before booking
Pain-first, soft-second.
That’s exactly what the AI code rescue audit answers. In 60+ vibe-coded codebases since 2023 we’ve found a median of 19 critical and high findings each. Most are invisible in the demo: leaked keys, row-level security off, endpoints that trust the client. The audit hands you the full list, ranked, with sample code per fix.
Yes. We audit eleven AI tools: Lovable, Bolt, v0, Cursor, Replit, Framer, Webflow, GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, ChatGPT, and Bubble. The audit pattern is the same across all of them. Each has a dedicated rescue page linked above, or send a 5-line brief and we’ll route you to the right one.
£8K fixed, 5 working days, all eleven tools. The fix list lands the morning after day five. If you then want the Critical and High items fixed for you, that’s a separate fixed-scope piece from £18K over 4-6 weeks. No surprises, the audit fee is the audit fee.
Directly. The audit ships an OWASP Top 10 pass, a pen-test summary, SOC-2-readiness notes, and GDPR / DSAR gaps in writing. That’s most of what a questionnaire asks for. Founders who book the audit before signing their first enterprise customer stop stalling on Question 14.
The audit gives you the architecture brief and ranked fix list a technical diligence call wants to see. You walk in able to show what’s found, what’s fixed, and what’s scheduled, with sample code so it’s real, not promised. Zero of our audited founders have lost an investor after the fix list shipped.
No. We hold the slot if your Tuesday slips. Send the 5-line brief, we reply inside 24 hours with availability and the next audit window, and the slot stays yours even if the date moves.
Day three of the audit is the architecture pass: the queries that won’t scale, the platform limits you’ve hit, and the cleanest migration path off the tool you built on. You get the fix list ranked by severity, so you fix what’s breaking you first, not what’s easiest.
No. You keep the full report whatever you do next, even if you take it to another team. If you want us to do the fixes, it’s a 30-day walk-away both ways and IP assigns on commit. The audit is the front door, not a trap.
In context
See it in context.
A look at the kind of ai rescues surface we hand over — real screens, real data, documented and yours from day one.
Five lines. That’s the brief.
The AI tool you used, the codebase size, and the deadline (investor, customer, regulator). Mohit replies inside 24 hours with availability and the next audit slot.
What happens after the email lands
- < 24h
A personal reply.
Availability, the next audit slot, and one question if your brief needs it.
- Day 1
The audit starts.
Secrets and auth first. Same pattern whichever AI tool you built in.
- Day 6
The fix list lands.
Ranked Critical / High / Medium, sample code per finding, in your inbox.